Written constitutions can become set in stone. If a constitution is to place limits on government or to set out the parameters within which governments must operate, then the fact that it can be adapted by government whim can be problematic.
Supporters of constitutional monarchies tend to be politically on the right. It is misleading to call Advantages and disadvantages of an unwritten British constitution unwritten; a more precise form of classification would be un-codified.
Of course, many other people who live under constitutional monarchies, where the head of state is unelected, deeply resent the situation. Would you like to merge this question into it? What is the unwritten constitution? However, this will be politically unpopular.
A Bill of Rights would overwrite some current laws and acts. Unwritten constitution is the one where various elements maybe written down but there is no one single document which outlines the constitution of the state.
Merits of Unwritten Constitution: MERGE exists and is an alternate of. What are some of the disadvantages of a constitutional monarchy? Then gangs such as bikie gangs would be allowed to assemble and may cause trouble.
What was appropriate in the past may become anachronistic, outmoded and inappropriate today; but the mere fact of being written into a formal constitution may hinder or prevent a timely or rational change.
For example, if you are a working class Scot, from say Glasgow, you might deeply resent the fact that for the last years the British head of state has always come from, and been born in, London and has always spoken with an accent associated with privilege, the upper class and southern England.
Would you like to merge this question into it? So when declaring independence and creating a constitution for this "union" the colonist were used to having things in writing like their Charters, so to put it simple they wanted something tangible "documented" Disadvantages of an Uncodified Constitution?
The exception of this was if a Bill was finacially related under a Unwritten Constitutionwhich in most cases suited the Lords fine. The British constitution was not written so there is no sort of documentation.
Monarchists in Spain actually established the fascist party. Unwritten constitutions are a collection of traditions that may or may not be written out in a single, coherent document--often they are amalgamations of numerous documents over long periods of time combined with rules that courts have developed over time e.
In addition, many would dispute the naive idea that a constitutional monarch makes for a truly neutral head of state. The big problem is that the constitutional monarch always comes from one class background and normally from just one region of a country.
Britain is one of few countries which do not have a codified constitution. In this way, the British unwritten Constitution is an advantage to one party, but a disadvantage to another.
Does the unwritten nature of the British Constitution mean that it is not entrenched if so is that an advantage or disadvantage of the constitution? Constitutional monarchs from birth live a very luxurious and privileged lifestyle and so naturally tend to have a conservative political bias and often hold quite right wing views.
What is unwritten law? NativeAmerican tribes are an example. First of all, a constitutional monarchy has a hereditary monarch as head of state who is only a figurehead with no real power.
Though most of countries have opted for written constitution, written constitutions are not necessarily superior to unwritten constitutions. Because there was no strct constitution, the Lords simply ignored previous tradition and vetoed the Bill.
For example, during the early s the British House of Lords had the ability to veto any Bill presented by the House of Commons it wanted, as long as it had a majority decision.
Of course, many other people who live under constitutional monarchies, where the head of state is unelected, deeply resent the situation. An unwritten constitution based on conventions has the advantage of being extremely adaptable or flexible.Advantages and Disadvantages of Written and Unwritten Constitutions Words | 14 Pages Identify and discuss the advantages and disadvantages of written and unwritten types of constitutions.
Nov 07, · please i need at least 5 advantages and 5 disadvantages of an unwritten mi-centre.com: Resolved.
In conclusion, there have been debates about the codification of the UK constitution in order to ensure complicit separation of powers. Nevertheless, the above discussion has highlighted the unwritten characteristic of the UK constitution and illustrated the various advantages, which have been observed over time.
What are the advantages and disadvantages of the unwritten constitution? Written: rules are specified and it is difficult to 'cheat' by ignoring them. Unwritten: rules are unspecified as a cohesive whole so it is easier for the system to be flex ible in response to political changes or the needs of a changing society.
The Advantages and Disadvantages of an Unwritten Constitution in the Uk; ADVANTAGES: An unwritten constitution based on conventions has the advantage of being extremely adaptable or flexible.
Since it is unwritten, it can be changed easily to deal with new situations. One of the disadvantages of an unwritten constitution is it allows for flexibility in interpreting what is and is not lawful.
There must be parameters established for any country to govern.Download