I assume you are referring to the adaptation starring John Malkovich. Lennie tries to stop her yelling and eventually, and accidentally, kills her by breaking her neck. There are shorter means, many of them. He killed a ranch foreman. He then shoots and kills Lennie, with Curley, Slim, and Carlson arriving seconds after.
Knowing a man well never leads to hate and nearly always leads to love. However, it takes after the original story in many ways; there is even dialogue that remains unchanged. A mentally disabledbut gigantic and physically strong man who travels with George and is his constant companion.
In contrast, the pair also meets Candy, an elderly ranch handyman with one hand and a loyal dog, and Slim, an intelligent and gentle jerkline-skinner whose dog has recently had a litter of puppies. All the settings are indoors except for the opening scene at a riverside campsite and the closing scene at the same place.
Candy is lonely after his dog is gone. She was very pretty and simple, and her face was sweet and young. Lennie aspires to be with George on his independent homestead, and to quench his fixation on soft objects.
Both the adaptation starring Lon Chaney Jr. Steinbeck apparently chose to make one of the characters retarded so that his friend has to explain everything to him in detail--and be explaining the plot to the audience at the same time. In fact, the dialogue is exact in many places including the dialect used by the characters.
There is an unusual amount of dialogue and little prose exposition. George hurries to find Lennie, hoping he will be at the meeting place they designated in case he got into trouble. Nevertheless, George feels more relaxed, to the extent that he even leaves Lennie behind on the ranch while he goes into town with the other ranch hands.
The major difference between this movie and the novel is that the filmmakers "opened up" the play by showing the vast fields of California with the men and horses working in the sun.
I worked in the same country that the story is laid in. Obviously, this scene may have proved difficult to film.
It is only 30, words in length.Jan 17, · 60 discussion posts. Becky said: Did anyone feel that the Of Mice and Men movie was better than the book? I didn't. I felt that the movie was too played. Get an answer for 'What are the differences and similarities between the movie and book versions of Steinbeck's Of Mice and Men?' and find homework help for other Of Mice and Men questions at eNotes.
Get free homework help on Steinbeck's Of Mice and Men: book summary, chapter summary and analysis, quotes, essays, and character analysis courtesy of CliffsNotes.
John Steinbeck's Of Mice and Men is a parable about what it means to be human. Steinbeck's story of George and Lennie's ambition of owning their own ranch, and the.
But "Of Mice And Men", This is a great book. One of my favorites, Right behind Robinson Crusoe. \ This book looks much like the picture but mine is more worn, has a little wear on the edges of the cover and the pages have that aged tea stained color and it smells old, Just the way I love em.
Mine is actually from /5(K). many fires; the limb is worn smooth by men who have sat on it. Evening of a hot day started the little wind to moving among the leaves. The shade climbed up the hills toward the top. On the sand banks the rabbits sat as quietly as little gray sculptured stones.
"Well, you ain't petting no mice while you walk with me. You. Oct 15, · What are 15 differences OF Mice and Men between the book and the movie? the version.
3 following. 3 answers 3. Report Abuse. Are you sure you want to delete this answer? What are 15 differences OF Mice and Men between the book and the movie?
the version. Source(s): Status: Resolved.Download